Dyno Testing
In order to see the effects of renewing our our
650 cfm Holley was tested before and after the rebuild
on a moderately built-up 351W test engine at the BIGS
shop.
Our
tired 650 was bolted on with no modifications other
than jetting up to account for the larger displacement
motor, and setting the idle speed and mixture. The motor
pumped out a peak of 458 horsepower and 460lb.ft. of
torque. Impressive numbers, but this is a 500 HP engine
with the correct size and tune carburetor.
After BIGS performed their rebuild and calibration,
the double pumper was bolted back on the test engine
for another round of dyno testing, as well as leak checks
and fine tuning. This time the engine responded with
475 HP and 483 lb.ft. of torque, a gain of 17 horsepower
and 23 lb.ft. at peak output. More impressively, as
the chart shows, are the gains all across the powerband.
Average horsepower improved from 389 to 405 horsepower,
and average torque was up to 426.5 lb.ft. from 409 lb.ft.
rpm
|
torque before
|
hp before
|
torque after
|
hp after
|
3900
|
421.6
|
313
|
434
|
322.2
|
4200
|
441.4
|
353
|
455.3
|
364.1
|
4500
|
451.6
|
386.9
|
483.9
|
414.6
|
4800
|
460.4
|
420.8
|
473.4
|
432.6
|
5100
|
449
|
436
|
460.4
|
447.1
|
5400
|
437.3
|
449.7
|
446.8
|
459.4
|
5700
|
419.7
|
458.8
|
427
|
463.4
|
6000
|
396.6
|
453.1
|
415.8
|
475
|
Installation and Track Testing Our plans from
the onset were to install the rebuilt 650 on Project
11.99 and perform a variety of track testing.
Installation was the easy part -we attached the fuel
line, and bolted the fresh carb on to our 302 motor
using a fresh basegasket. Other than setting the idle
speed and mixture, all we had to do was ensure our fuel
pressure was at 6-7 psi, and connect the throttle linkage.
Based on BIGS recommendation, we left the jetting how
they set it, 72 primary
and 78 secondary. A couple tips: use a permanent marker
to note the jet sizes on the bowls, this way you won't
forget and have to pull the bowls off to check! Also
if you are running a cheapo chrome plated dual-feel
fuel line, splice in a piece of rubber fuel hose as
shown. This way you have enough flexibility to remove
the bowls and change jets without having to disturb
the hard-to-seal fuel fittings.
We've had the BIGS 650 installed for a few months now,
with the intention to perform a wide range of testing
on Project 11.99, including a comparison of the 650
on a Weiand Stealth dual-plane intake against the 750
cfm/Victor Jr. induction package we had been running.
Unfortunately we haven't had a lot of seat time at the
track due to many reasons, the least of which is the
possibility that our budget 400HP
302 is in need of a rebuild. The last trip to the
track revealed low and fluctuating oil pressure during
each run. Nevertheless, the BIGS 650 sitting on top
of the Victor Jr. did manage a 12.19 @ 115 mph.
The car has run a best of 11.96 @ 116 using the 750
cfm double-pumper and Vic. Jr, however that was in the
winter with air temperature in the low 60's. On this
particular outing the ambient temps were in the 80's,
and we only were able to get off three passes, before
having to stop due to fluctuating oil pressure.
Nevertheless, the biggest gain seems to be in driveability.
A 750cfm carb may make more peak power on a 302 that
runs to 7000rpm, however it is at the expense of driveability
and throttle response. The BIGS 650 not only idles and
drives perfectly, but the modifications by BIGS make
it perform comparable to the larger carburetor, trading
some top end power for low-mid range grunt.
As soon as the summer crowds thin out at our local track
we plan to get Project 11.99 back out there for a more
in-depth track session with the BIGS 650. Look for our
dual-plane vs. single-plane manifold comparison soon!
|